The Dernogalizer

March 13, 2009

Clean Coal was Never Being Developed by Bush Admin!

Filed under: Energy/Climate — Matt Dernoga @ 4:25 pm
Tags: , ,

I’ve documented plenty of reasons why coal use needs to be phased out, and “clean coal” is a joke. In case you need a recap…..The coal industry has gotten a lot of much deserved negative press ever since the coal slurry dam disaster that happened a few months ago. This brought to light that, maybe we should regulate our coal ash. Of course, no amount of regulation will ever make \”clean coal\” a reality, especially considering that it’s extraction often involves the very destructive mountain top removal. Oh..and coal is getting more expensive.

Now there is ANOTHER giant nail in the coffin. This nail is actually pretty sad. There’s been a new report released by the House Committee on Science and Technology which found that the Bush Administration was never actually seriously developing clean coal technology and their entire “FutureGen Program” was pretty much PR the entire time. So not only is there no such thing as “clean coal”, but there was never actually any legitimate attempt to develop it. This sets things back at least 10 years. Even if we got serious about it now, the report says that wide-scale deployment would be realistic in the year 2040. Thanks President Bush.

press release

and if you can bear it…FULL REPORT

BEST QUOTES:

“In retrospect, FutureGen appears to have been nothing more than a public relations ploy for Bush Administration officials to make it appear to the public and the world that the United States was doing something to address global warming despite its refusal to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.”

“Career staff produced a summary analysis by December 2007 that was entitled, “What “Plan B” would NOT accomplish” (emphasis in original). The concluding paragraphs are so compelling that they are worth quoting at length: Given the above delays [following analysis of how Plan B would slow technology development and deployment], it is reasonable to assume that proceeding with “Plan B” and without FutureGen, the availability of affordable coal fueled CCS plants would be delayed at least 10 years and will not allow widespread deployment of CCS until near 2040.”

“In abandoning the original concept, the Department of Energy left the country with no coherent strategy for carbon capture and sequestration—despite having fingers in many pots. Whether the new Administration and Congress should revive the original program, which was ready to begin work when the Department of Energy killed it, or move to some other initiative, is an open question. It is absolutely clear that the “Plan B” initiative sold to the public and the Congress by Secretary Bodman will not provide the kind of long-term benefits to the United States and the world needed to deal with global climate change. The end result of this trail of mismanagement? Progress on the great challenges to harness technology to build a greener energy future was stalled, and the United States abandoned its global leadership role. This is a disappointing legacy for the Department of Energy.”

Environment Business Directory - BTS Local

About these ads

12 Comments »

  1. [...] This is cross-posted from: here [...]

    Pingback by Clean Coal was Never Being Developed by Bush Admin! | CCAN Blog — March 13, 2009 @ 4:35 pm | Reply

  2. why is this not surprising…

    in case you haven’t seen the clean coal parody commercials:

    Comment by douglaskev — March 13, 2009 @ 7:32 pm | Reply

  3. why is this not surprising…

    in case you haven’t seen the clean coal parody commercials:


    Oops…forgot to say great post! Looking forward to your next one.

    Comment by douglaskev — March 14, 2009 @ 6:49 am | Reply

  4. thanks! yeah I’ve seen those parody commercials, the first one is my favorite

    Comment by Matt Dernoga — March 14, 2009 @ 11:29 am | Reply

  5. Ah, BushCo. redefined F.U.D. and B.S. in so many ways… it will take years and years and countless taxpayer dollars to clean up the mess (assuming we can), and in the end it’s likely that no-one will get prosecuted and the problems will only be compounded during the delays in which we argue and argue about what should/ought/must be done.

    To paraphrase the Radiohead song: We did it to ourselves, we did, and that’s what really hurts.

    Comment by James P. — March 14, 2009 @ 8:20 pm | Reply

    • thanks for the comment James, I agree we’re going to need to buy a pretty large broom to clean this one up.

      Comment by Matt Dernoga — March 14, 2009 @ 8:52 pm | Reply

  6. Couldn’t agree with you more Matt, nice job.

    Comment by countryfriedfred — March 16, 2009 @ 6:06 pm | Reply

    • thanks!

      Comment by Matt Dernoga — March 16, 2009 @ 10:07 pm | Reply

  7. Good post…..thanx for stopping by Info Ink

    Comment by lobotero — March 17, 2009 @ 4:22 am | Reply

    • thanks lobotero

      Comment by Matt Dernoga — March 17, 2009 @ 9:36 am | Reply

  8. [...] question combined the fact that efforts to develop clean coal technology had failed, that the extraction of coal is destructive, and whether or not Congressman Hoyer would support a [...]

    Pingback by Steny Hoyer Town Hall « The Dernogalizer — May 12, 2009 @ 6:57 pm | Reply

  9. [...] are plenty of reasons why burning coal is a bad idea.  Least of all being destruction of the planet.  One of the comments Steny Hoyer [...]

    Pingback by Peak Coal « The Dernogalizer — May 17, 2009 @ 5:37 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: